Avowed living lands1/1/2024 ![]() Some of those might have welcomed the American invasion if provided assurances that their homes were more than just a diplomatic bargaining chip in America’s struggle with the British. complete its conquest.īut the lack of a formal policy alienated many Canadians living in the north. As a result, Republicans avoided formulating a concrete proposal regarding their plans for Canada should the U.S. The idea of taking permanent possession of Canada became a divisive issue within the Republican party. Adding new free states without a concurrent expansion in the South threatened to disrupt the regional and political balance of power. Southern Republicans in particular worried that Canada would eventually become a collection of non-slave states. Those alliances had long been frustrating to Americans hoping to expand the nation westward.īut still other Republicans questioned the wisdom of permanently absorbing Canada. Acquiring Canada permanently would help make America more secure, as well, by severing connections between the British and their native allies. To them, the acquisition of Canada would provide some compensation for America’s commercial, material, and manpower losses. Other Republicans saw Canada in more functional terms. Some believed that the conquest and acquisition of Canada believed that part of America’s destiny on the continent was to expand to the north. But Republicans were divided over what they might do with Canada after conquering it. Canada’s apparent vulnerability-Jefferson had famously suggested that its conquest would be “a mere matter of marching” for American troops-made it an even more enticing target. With little hope of besting the British in a naval war on the Atlantic, only the conquest of Canada remained as a way to force Britain to negotiate concessions. ![]() But the majority argued that contesting Britain’s maritime supremacy with just a handful of American warships would be a futile effort. Since several of America’s war aims focused on maritime issues (ending the practice of impressment and stopping British interference with neutral shipping), some politicians from both parties recommended pursuing a limited war on the high seas. The Americans had a limited range of options upon embarking on a war against one of the world’s great superpowers. Why, then, did Republicans decide on invading Canada with land forces? Was there a plan to keep Canada, or did they hope to use it as a bargaining chip in negotiations with the British? The primary impetus for waging war against Great Britain revolved around maritime issues. The Clements Library, University of Michigan In the absence of official government policy on Canada, US General William Hull went ahead & established his own, proclaiming to Canadians that they would be “emancipated from Tyranny and oppression and restored to the dignified status of freemen.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |